WAVEFORMLESS: Can you take us a bit through your song creation process? How does a typical Portion Control song take shape?
PORTION CONTROL: A Portion Control song usually starts with a simple kick pattern followed by a one or two bar step-programmed bass line. Strobe is a recent favourite, Z3ta an old favourite, as well as Reaktor (user ensemble) Viral Extinction. Then, the other drums are built up. Often I'll add a one bar note and flick through presets on our synths adding LFO, gating, phasing, distortion and bit reduction until a rhythm or sound fits into place. Meanwhile, Dean works on the vocals, which are laid into the track, and the arrangement is worked on – small snippets of found sounds, samples or effected synth parts are added – distilling the arrangement. We use hard quantized sequencing, often with unchanging cycling patterns to form the tracks basis. Sound shaping and effects play a major role on a track by track basis. We are conscious not to over embellish - an easy trap to fall into with today’s powerful sequencers. If we are working on a CD we keep writing tracks, constantly reviewing them until we have 10-12 with enough variety to form a product. These are then worked on simultaneously until finalized. As a result, we usually end up with lots of small 1,2,4, and 8 bar parts which aren't used in tracks but are archived into our sample libraries for future projects. Dean also programs ideas in Reason on his laptop – mainly bass lines and rhythm parts which I then work into finished tracks
WAVEFORMLESS: I’m assuming you’ve at least partially embraced software as a part of your music making, as even in the old days you made use of an Apple II for sampling if I’m not mistaken. What are your favorite pieces of software these days, whether it’s a DAW, effects, soft synths, etc? How do you feel the modern software instruments compare to the hardware synths you used earlier in your career?
PORTION CONTROL: Favourite piece of software is very difficult. Native Instruments Reaktor is great especially if you delve into the user ensembles. The FXpansion DCAM Synth Squad is as good as software gets (at the moment). Lots of bass and presence - just push up that drive knob! Guru, also from FXpansion, is great. It works well with any samples, allows more sound shaping than anything else, and you can just drag the MIDI or even render the parts and drag them into your DAW. From our earliest beginnings, we were early adopters of new kit and so it’s natural that we were quick to embrace new software. In 2004 when we released “Wellcome”, we had a number of listeners refusing to believe it was made with software only.
WAVEFORMLESS: Tell us a bit about the mixers, audio interfaces, mics, and monitors you favor these days.
PORTION CONTROL: We use Genelec powered monitors, a Focusrite Sapphire LE card. Rock 17” Laptop with Resolume for live graphics. A fast quad core PC with 2X26” monitors. The only recorded content is vocals.
WAVEFORMLESS: What computer platform and DAW?
PORTION CONTROL: We use PC’s and a number of different DAW's which all have different strengths. Ableton we bought recently at version 8 when group tracks were added. We had been skeptical about Ableton's reputation as a DJ tool, but the more we use it the better it gets, especially for cropping loops and creating song sections. We also like Reaper for sound design as it's very stable and light on resources and we have a few macro commands to render MIDI to audio etc. We also use Acid Pro 7 which is good for arranging samples as you can see lots of tracks and the stretching, slicing, snapping is excellent. Lastly, we have Cubase, which we have used from its early days on the Atari ST - just hate the price of updates and it seems so bloated and counter intuitive nowadays. We did also use Sonar, but it just proved unreliable and would freeze when using some more demanding Audio Damage plug-ins. The biggest single most liberating factor has been that we can mix and master ourselves to have total control over the final product. Our set-up is completely different from our beginnings where sequencing was in its infancy – and we don’t miss anything from this period apart from our naivety in song writing – which added character to the early material.
WAVEFORMLESS: Is there a piece of gear or software that doesn’t exist that you’d like to see someone create? Do you find any frustrations working with computers and software in general?
PORTION CONTROL: My frustration is with different DAW’s having strengths and weaknesses - having to satisfy so many varied users. I would like to see a DAW that combined the basic workflow of Ableton with the audio arrange part of Acid and the mixer/eq/mastering from Cubase or maybe Pro Tools. Oh yeah - with the support and community of Reaper. The complexities of having everything working correctly is a natural frustration of using computers for music making, but I do believe that it’s never been better or more powerful than now and the hardware software debate is rapidly becoming pointless
WAVEFORMLESS: The music business itself has changed a lot just in the last ten years. What’s the most difficult adjustment for you in adapting to this new environment? Conversely, what are the advantages you see nowadays?
PORTION CONTROL: Portion Control has never been a commercial concern. Perversely, we sort of hate the music industry, so it’s been good to see its excesses come to an end. My real fear is for independent labels as the majors fight for percentages from selling catalogues to phone and download/streaming companies. I guess it is disappointing that music doesn’t play such a pivotal role to younger people as they grow up, but equally the music industry has done nothing to help itself. By and large we listen to it in an inferior format now. The advantages are that for a modest sum you can record your own projects, keep full control, and post them onto the internet for access by anybody. Where the music industry will be in 20 years is an interesting thought…
WAVEFORMLESS: If someone invented a time machine and you could go back and give one piece of advice to the “you “of 30 years ago, what would it be?
PORTION CONTROL: That’s a good question! With a simple answer - stick to your principals and don’t be influenced by others opinions.
WAVEFORMLESS: Lastly, let’s look to the future. What are you current and future plans for Portion Control?
PORTION CONTROL: We are working on a new CD for release in early 2010. The tracks are being finalised at the moment… We are hoping it will be our most accessible release so far…with our usual trademark style, of course…
__________________
Portion Control has been kind enough to donate 5 copies of their "CROP" release to give away to Waveformless readers. (UPDATE: WE HAVE OUR 5 WINNERS! CONGRATS TO JESPER, JOSHUA, JOHAN, DRE, and PAUL!) We've been discussing something else special for Waveformless readers in the near future too, so keep reading!
Portion Control Official Website
11 comments:
Tom, thanks for this interview. PorCon is one of my absolute faves, and your article illustrated their working methods brilliantly.
GREAT interview, Tom!
Always great to hear talent talk about music.
Also good hear someone agree with the DAW situation.
Great interview and a great read. Enjoyed your blog a lot lately - and your gig in Melbourne a while back (got to see legendary Dave Foreman onstage with you, met cute girls, fantastic night)!
It's interesting that the more "veteran" members of the electronic community love their plugins so, while those of us who're a bit newer fawn over analogue hardware that drove them nuts. I think there's love for both here :)
James - Thanks! We're hoping to make it back to Aus again. I agree that a mix of both hardware and software is ideal. Although I definitely am using more software these days, hardware is so much more fun to program.
It'd be great if you did... We've had some good promoters and tough promoters here, but been very lucky to see bands like yours, Destroid, Covenant et al many thousands of miles from their usual stomping grounds. I even remember the first VNV tour when my old band played support (I remember drunkenly abusing Ronan Harris for not dressing up on stage like the brat I was).
As for hardware vs. software...I tend to have better ideas for patches with a physical interface...and there's something about recorded sound...but there's no question the latest crop of softsynths are pretty good.
PorCon is one of my absolute faves, and your article illustrated their working methods brilliantly.It's interesting that the more "veteran" members of the electronic community love their plug-ins so, while those of us who're a bit newer fawn over analogue hardware that drove them nuts.England's Portion Control have cast all others aside and become, once more, the preeminent electronic act by which all others are measured. With "Welcome" they showed an experimental flair no one would ever have suspected them of harboring. It was a well-timed return, 2004 had it's share of fine audio releases but none were quite as captivating, few showed such a wealth of styles and guises.
cheap dj gear
I enjoyed the thoroughness of your info.
Many types of youtube converter are disorganize or else even appear among for free trials.
Quite worthwhile information, lots of thanks for your post.
Pretty effective data, thank you for this post.
Post a Comment